Skip to content

Exports — Word, CSV

At the end of an analysis LiquiTer NX produces 2 outputs, accessible from the toolbar:

Word report (.docx)

The Word report is a pre-formatted technical report, compliant with NTC 2018 chap. 7.11.3.4.

What it contains

  1. Cover page with: title, description, site, operator, date, GPS map
  2. Input data summary:
  3. Stratigraphy table (γ, N-SPT, qc, Vs, % clay)
  4. Seismic parameters (a_g, Mw, code, ground category, S_S, S_T)
  5. Water table depth
  6. Calculation methodology:
  7. Normative reference
  8. Selected method + formulas
  9. Values of the correction coefficients (r_d, MSF, K_σ)
  10. Results:
  11. Table by depth (z, σ_v, σ'_v, CSR, CRR, FSL, verdict)
  12. FSL vs z plot
  13. LPI and risk classification
  14. Per-layer settlements + total settlement
  15. Conclusions:
  16. Site susceptibility summary
  17. Any recommendations (mitigation, further investigation)

Compatibility

Opens in:

  • Microsoft Word 2016+
  • LibreOffice Writer 6+
  • Google Docs (uploaded to Drive)
  • Pages (macOS)

Charts are embedded PNG at 300 DPI.

Customising the template

If you need a custom corporate layout (firm logo, specific fonts), contact info@geostru.ai — we can configure a dedicated template for your studio.

CSV — raw data

Tabular export in CSV (UTF-8 BOM encoding, comma separator), compatible with Excel / LibreOffice / Google Sheets / Python.

Columns included

z, sigma_v, sigma_v_eff, r_d, CSR, CRR, FSL, MSF, K_sigma, verdict, IPL_contrib, settlement_cm

When it makes sense

  • Sensitivity analysis — export CSV with the results of Seed, Tokimatsu, Boulanger and produce comparative charts in Excel
  • Combine with other surveys — liquefaction comparison across multiple sites
  • Custom recomputation in Python (e.g. compute settlements with alternative methods such as Cetin)
  • Long-term archival in a forever-readable format

FSL and LPI interpretation

The FSL and LPI values are not a verdict: they must be read with judgement.

FSL — depth-by-depth safety factor

FSL Meaning Action
> 1.5 Stable with margin None
1.25 – 1.5 Stable (NTC margin) None
1.0 – 1.25 Close to the limit Investigate further, consider mitigation
< 1.0 Liquefiable Mitigation required

LPI — overall site index

Iwasaki et al. (1982):

LPI Risk Typical decision
0 Negligible Standard construction
0–5 Low Standard construction, watch foundations
5–15 Medium Mitigation recommended or stiff raft
> 15 High Mitigation mandatory (jet grouting, drains, piles)

Final decision is the professional's

LiquiTer produces geometric / statistical input for the report. The final decision (site OK / mitigation needed / which mitigation type) lies with the engineer / geologist who signs the project. Liquefaction susceptibility must be combined with seismic-risk assessment, the nominal-life class of the structure, the criticality of the foundations.

See also

Page useful? Contact us.